https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167123 Broadcast reproduction right is treated as a separate statutory right distinct from copyright, so the impleadment requirement in Section 61 of the Copyright Act does not extend to infringement proceedings based on that right unless expressly provided. The appellant's telecast, incorporating its own commentary, graphics, technical inputs and studio coverage, was capable of creating an independent protectable right in the modified broadcast. On fair dealing, repeated or extensive use of substantial cricket footage for commercially attractive programming may exceed news reporting protection and amount to commercially competitive exploitation. The suit was therefore not defeated by non-compliance with Section 61, and the matter was restored for further disposal. en-us Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Dec 2014 16:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167123 Broadcast reproduction right is treated as a separate statutory right distinct from copyright, so the impleadment requirement in Section 61 of the Copyright Act does not extend to infringement proceedings based on that right unless expressly provided. The appellant's telecast, incorporating its own commentary, graphics, technical inputs and studio coverage, was capable of creating an independent protectable right in the modified broadcast. On fair dealing, repeated or extensive use of substantial cricket footage for commercially attractive programming may exceed news reporting protection and amount to commercially competitive exploitation. The suit was therefore not defeated by non-compliance with Section 61, and the matter was restored for further disposal. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167123