<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 317 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167121</link>
    <description>An import-control authority cannot reopen or override an unconditional customs clearance, because the customs adjudication is final within the customs framework and cannot be reviewed indirectly through import-control powers. The document also notes that beef tallow had become a canalised item under the prevailing import policy, so import against REP licences was unauthorised as a matter of policy. Even so, that policy breach did not justify contrary administrative action once Customs had already cleared the goods unconditionally. The stated ratio is that executive import-control action is without jurisdiction where it seeks to contradict a final customs clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 14:33:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 317 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167121</link>
      <description>An import-control authority cannot reopen or override an unconditional customs clearance, because the customs adjudication is final within the customs framework and cannot be reviewed indirectly through import-control powers. The document also notes that beef tallow had become a canalised item under the prevailing import policy, so import against REP licences was unauthorised as a matter of policy. Even so, that policy breach did not justify contrary administrative action once Customs had already cleared the goods unconditionally. The stated ratio is that executive import-control action is without jurisdiction where it seeks to contradict a final customs clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>