<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 344 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167118</link>
    <description>Conversion of acetic acid into acetic anhydride was treated as manufacture because the supplied material lost its identity and a new product with a different name, character and use emerged. The job-work exemption under Notification No. 119/75 applied only where an article is supplied for processing and returned after that process; it did not cover a process resulting in a distinct excisable product. On that basis, the exemption was denied. The proposed reference to a larger Bench was not accepted by the majority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 14:07:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 344 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167118</link>
      <description>Conversion of acetic acid into acetic anhydride was treated as manufacture because the supplied material lost its identity and a new product with a different name, character and use emerged. The job-work exemption under Notification No. 119/75 applied only where an article is supplied for processing and returned after that process; it did not cover a process resulting in a distinct excisable product. On that basis, the exemption was denied. The proposed reference to a larger Bench was not accepted by the majority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>