<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 326 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that imported Palmolein did not qualify for exemption from additional customs duty as an unprocessed vegetable non-essential oil (VNE oil) or as equivalent to palm oil for excise duty exemption. Despite the appellants&#039; arguments, the Tribunal found that palmolein was distinct from palm oil based on processing and standards, leading to the rejection of duty exemption claims. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed, and the appellants&#039; claims for duty exemption on Palmolein were denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 12:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 326 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that imported Palmolein did not qualify for exemption from additional customs duty as an unprocessed vegetable non-essential oil (VNE oil) or as equivalent to palm oil for excise duty exemption. Despite the appellants&#039; arguments, the Tribunal found that palmolein was distinct from palm oil based on processing and standards, leading to the rejection of duty exemption claims. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed, and the appellants&#039; claims for duty exemption on Palmolein were denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>