<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 366 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167081</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for a stay on the operation of the Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal regarding the liability for payment of differential duty on glass bottles. The Tribunal noted that no specific demand for the duty amount had been made yet and clarified that its power to make interlocutory orders did not extend to interfering with assessments beyond the appeal&#039;s subject matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 12:46:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 366 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167081</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for a stay on the operation of the Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal regarding the liability for payment of differential duty on glass bottles. The Tribunal noted that no specific demand for the duty amount had been made yet and clarified that its power to make interlocutory orders did not extend to interfering with assessments beyond the appeal&#039;s subject matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>