<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 250 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal, affirming the applicability of the auxiliary duty under the Finance Act, 1979, and nullifying the ad hoc exemption order under the Finance Act, 1978 with Notification No. 61-Customs. The Tribunal found no merit in arguments regarding the General Clauses Act or the exemption order&#039;s continuation beyond 31-3-1979.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:51:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 250 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal, affirming the applicability of the auxiliary duty under the Finance Act, 1979, and nullifying the ad hoc exemption order under the Finance Act, 1978 with Notification No. 61-Customs. The Tribunal found no merit in arguments regarding the General Clauses Act or the exemption order&#039;s continuation beyond 31-3-1979.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>