<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 242 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the original assessment of duty by Customs authorities, classifying the imported goods as packings, rings, and seals under Chapter 39 of the Customs Tariff Schedule. The appellants&#039; argument for classification under different headings was dismissed, as the goods were deemed to be correctly classified based on the material they were made of, akin to joints, washers, and the like. The Tribunal found that the goods did not qualify as identifiable parts of machinery under Heading No. 87.04/06(2) or as &quot;machinery parts, not elsewhere specified&quot; under Heading No. 84.65, resulting in the rejection of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 17:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 242 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the original assessment of duty by Customs authorities, classifying the imported goods as packings, rings, and seals under Chapter 39 of the Customs Tariff Schedule. The appellants&#039; argument for classification under different headings was dismissed, as the goods were deemed to be correctly classified based on the material they were made of, akin to joints, washers, and the like. The Tribunal found that the goods did not qualify as identifiable parts of machinery under Heading No. 87.04/06(2) or as &quot;machinery parts, not elsewhere specified&quot; under Heading No. 84.65, resulting in the rejection of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>