<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 356 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167038</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, setting aside the rejection of the import license application for a printing machine based on age and spare parts availability concerns. The court directed the 2nd respondent to review the application within one month, emphasizing adherence to the import policy criteria and the Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate confirming the machine&#039;s suitability. No costs were awarded, and the order was to be communicated within two weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:47:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 356 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167038</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, setting aside the rejection of the import license application for a printing machine based on age and spare parts availability concerns. The court directed the 2nd respondent to review the application within one month, emphasizing adherence to the import policy criteria and the Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate confirming the machine&#039;s suitability. No costs were awarded, and the order was to be communicated within two weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>