<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 230 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167035</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application for a stay of recovery of duty and penalty pending the Reference Application&#039;s consideration. The Tribunal emphasized that the Act does not provide for an appeal against orders of a Regional Bench, making their decisions final. It was concluded that the circumstances of the case did not warrant the exercise of any inherent power in favor of the appellant, leading to the rejection of the application for a stay of recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:15:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 230 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167035</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application for a stay of recovery of duty and penalty pending the Reference Application&#039;s consideration. The Tribunal emphasized that the Act does not provide for an appeal against orders of a Regional Bench, making their decisions final. It was concluded that the circumstances of the case did not warrant the exercise of any inherent power in favor of the appellant, leading to the rejection of the application for a stay of recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>