https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167033 An order passed by a Collector acting under authority delegated by the Administrator under the Gold (Control) Act was treated as an exercise of statutory power, so the appellate tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Refusal to induct a new person as partner in an existing licensed firm was upheld because bringing in an outsider would change the constitution of the partnership and could not be treated as a mere administrative alteration under the existing licence. The proposed partner acquired no automatic right to induction, and a fresh licence application was required for such a change. en-us Mon, 04 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:06:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167033 An order passed by a Collector acting under authority delegated by the Administrator under the Gold (Control) Act was treated as an exercise of statutory power, so the appellate tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Refusal to induct a new person as partner in an existing licensed firm was upheld because bringing in an outsider would change the constitution of the partnership and could not be treated as a mere administrative alteration under the existing licence. The proposed partner acquired no automatic right to induction, and a fresh licence application was required for such a change. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167033