<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 227 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167032</link>
    <description>Protective provisions for notified goods kept in residential premises for personal use can bar confiscation where possession is supported by a voucher and unlawful sale or disposal is not proved. The customs record here did not establish the essential ingredients of sale or knowledge of illegal disposal by the person from whom the goods were seized. Confiscation was also unsustainable because mandatory notice and opportunity of representation under the Customs Act were not shown to have been complied with before the order. On that basis, the confiscation and personal penalties were set aside and the appellate relief was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:02:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 227 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167032</link>
      <description>Protective provisions for notified goods kept in residential premises for personal use can bar confiscation where possession is supported by a voucher and unlawful sale or disposal is not proved. The customs record here did not establish the essential ingredients of sale or knowledge of illegal disposal by the person from whom the goods were seized. Confiscation was also unsustainable because mandatory notice and opportunity of representation under the Customs Act were not shown to have been complied with before the order. On that basis, the confiscation and personal penalties were set aside and the appellate relief was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>