<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 225 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253881</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for both assessees, ruling that the penalties were justified as the assessees failed to explain the cash credits, leading to concealed income. The Tribunal emphasized that voluntary surrender of income does not exempt the assessee from penalties, especially when done under compulsion, as in this case where the surrender was due to being cornered by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 06:32:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 225 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253881</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for both assessees, ruling that the penalties were justified as the assessees failed to explain the cash credits, leading to concealed income. The Tribunal emphasized that voluntary surrender of income does not exempt the assessee from penalties, especially when done under compulsion, as in this case where the surrender was due to being cornered by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>