https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253857 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the extended period for recovery of Cenvat credit was not applicable due to lack of evidence of suppression of facts. The Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of liabilities pending appeal, indicating potential time-barring of the demand. The dispute centered on the eligibility of Cenvat credit for parts used in a captive power plant, with the appellants arguing compliance with ER-1 returns and denying any suppression of facts. en-us Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Dec 2014 22:09:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253857 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the extended period for recovery of Cenvat credit was not applicable due to lack of evidence of suppression of facts. The Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of liabilities pending appeal, indicating potential time-barring of the demand. The dispute centered on the eligibility of Cenvat credit for parts used in a captive power plant, with the appellants arguing compliance with ER-1 returns and denying any suppression of facts. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253857