<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 200 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal without costs, confirming the previous order. The decision emphasized the timing of credit reversal and utilization in determining liability for interest and penalties under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The case underscored the importance of legal precedents and amendments in clarifying the application of rules and regulations in excise matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 200 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal without costs, confirming the previous order. The decision emphasized the timing of credit reversal and utilization in determining liability for interest and penalties under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The case underscored the importance of legal precedents and amendments in clarifying the application of rules and regulations in excise matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>