https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253854 The Tribunal directed the applicant to predeposit a specific amount within a set timeframe, with the balance dues predeposit waived upon compliance. The decision highlighted the lack of strong prima facie evidence supporting the applicant's claim of factory shifting, leading to the directive for predeposit. The judgment emphasized the importance of satisfying the conditions under Rule 10 for credit transfer eligibility, which was not met in the present case due to the unresolved dispute regarding factory shifting. en-us Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Dec 2014 22:07:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253854 The Tribunal directed the applicant to predeposit a specific amount within a set timeframe, with the balance dues predeposit waived upon compliance. The decision highlighted the lack of strong prima facie evidence supporting the applicant's claim of factory shifting, leading to the directive for predeposit. The judgment emphasized the importance of satisfying the conditions under Rule 10 for credit transfer eligibility, which was not met in the present case due to the unresolved dispute regarding factory shifting. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253854