<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 185 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253841</link>
    <description>The court held that the respondent assessee was entitled to the benefit of the proviso added to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010, making the disallowance under this section unsustainable. Regarding the rate of depreciation on trucks, the court dismissed the appeal as the motor lorries were found to be used for hire and revenue generation in the business of transportation of goods, aligning with relevant precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 12:49:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 185 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253841</link>
      <description>The court held that the respondent assessee was entitled to the benefit of the proviso added to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010, making the disallowance under this section unsustainable. Regarding the rate of depreciation on trucks, the court dismissed the appeal as the motor lorries were found to be used for hire and revenue generation in the business of transportation of goods, aligning with relevant precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>