<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Manufacturing Activity Qualifies for Duty Exemption Despite Missing Declaration, Per Notification No. 50/2003-C.E.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20898</link>
    <description>Area based exemption - When the Department at a later date took a view that the appellant’s activity amounted to manufacture, the benefit of duty exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-C.E. could not be denied just on the ground that before effecting clearances they did not file the required declaration. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:45:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:45:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Manufacturing Activity Qualifies for Duty Exemption Despite Missing Declaration, Per Notification No. 50/2003-C.E.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20898</link>
      <description>Area based exemption - When the Department at a later date took a view that the appellant’s activity amounted to manufacture, the benefit of duty exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-C.E. could not be denied just on the ground that before effecting clearances they did not file the required declaration. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:45:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>