<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Denies Waiver of Pre-Deposit in Tyre Cord Fabric Classification Dispute; Claims Deemed Unsupported by Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20897</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre deposit - Classification of goods - distinction between dipped tyre cord fabric and rubberised tyre cord fabric - the appellants contention that the impugned goods were rubberised tyre cord fabrics obtained after stage 2 is an afterthought contrary to the evidence on record - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:44:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:44:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Denies Waiver of Pre-Deposit in Tyre Cord Fabric Classification Dispute; Claims Deemed Unsupported by Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20897</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre deposit - Classification of goods - distinction between dipped tyre cord fabric and rubberised tyre cord fabric - the appellants contention that the impugned goods were rubberised tyre cord fabrics obtained after stage 2 is an afterthought contrary to the evidence on record - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:44:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>