<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 169 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253825</link>
    <description>Services rendered in India to a foreign principal were treated as export of services where the recipient and beneficiary were abroad and consideration was received in convertible foreign exchange, so the distribution or agency fee was not liable to service tax. A freight-saving incentive was held not to be Cargo Handling Service because no service-provider and service-recipient relationship existed, so the receipt was not taxable. Customs clearance, port clearance and transportation charges under separate contracts and invoices could not be clubbed as a single composite Clearing and Forwarding Agency service absent evidence of artificial splitting, so those receipts were also not taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 169 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253825</link>
      <description>Services rendered in India to a foreign principal were treated as export of services where the recipient and beneficiary were abroad and consideration was received in convertible foreign exchange, so the distribution or agency fee was not liable to service tax. A freight-saving incentive was held not to be Cargo Handling Service because no service-provider and service-recipient relationship existed, so the receipt was not taxable. Customs clearance, port clearance and transportation charges under separate contracts and invoices could not be clubbed as a single composite Clearing and Forwarding Agency service absent evidence of artificial splitting, so those receipts were also not taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>