<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 166 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration after hearing the appellants on all issues. All views expressed were prima facie, and all issues were kept open for adjudication in the de novo proceedings. Deficiencies in the adjudication process should be addressed in the re-adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 166 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration after hearing the appellants on all issues. All views expressed were prima facie, and all issues were kept open for adjudication in the de novo proceedings. Deficiencies in the adjudication process should be addressed in the re-adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>