<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Un-necessary litigation before High Court on petty matters ignoring ground realities when CIT(A) and Tribunal had concurrently allowed relief to assessee.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5931</link>
    <description>Assessment of petty business expenditures must be governed by the factual matrix: nature, size, recipient, timing, place, urgency, total petty cash, and internal controls. Assessing officers should adapt verification standards to business scale; organized entities usually document major payments via banking and TDS, while small operational payments may be validated by internal vouchers and corroborative work records. Where CIT(A) and the Tribunal concurrently find cogent material supporting genuineness, courts should not interfere absent perversity or a substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:49:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:49:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Un-necessary litigation before High Court on petty matters ignoring ground realities when CIT(A) and Tribunal had concurrently allowed relief to assessee.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5931</link>
      <description>Assessment of petty business expenditures must be governed by the factual matrix: nature, size, recipient, timing, place, urgency, total petty cash, and internal controls. Assessing officers should adapt verification standards to business scale; organized entities usually document major payments via banking and TDS, while small operational payments may be validated by internal vouchers and corroborative work records. Where CIT(A) and the Tribunal concurrently find cogent material supporting genuineness, courts should not interfere absent perversity or a substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:49:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>