<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 147 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253803</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act regarding costs of sales of land. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation and application of the law to be legally sound, emphasizing the need to meet specific conditions for the proviso to apply. The judgment stressed the importance of factual circumstances in applying tax provisions and dismissed all appeals for lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:29:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 147 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253803</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act regarding costs of sales of land. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation and application of the law to be legally sound, emphasizing the need to meet specific conditions for the proviso to apply. The judgment stressed the importance of factual circumstances in applying tax provisions and dismissed all appeals for lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>