<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 138 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee&#039;s transactions were investments and not trades. Therefore, the income from the sale of shares should be assessed under the head &#039;capital gains&#039; and not as business income. The appeals filed by the assessees were allowed, and the AO was directed to treat the impugned income from the sale of shares as assessable under the head &#039;capital gains&#039;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 138 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee&#039;s transactions were investments and not trades. Therefore, the income from the sale of shares should be assessed under the head &#039;capital gains&#039; and not as business income. The appeals filed by the assessees were allowed, and the AO was directed to treat the impugned income from the sale of shares as assessable under the head &#039;capital gains&#039;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>