https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253772 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in Appeal No. E/3648/2006, allowing the appeal based on limitation and jurisdiction grounds. Conversely, Appeal No. E/2758/2007 by the Revenue was rejected for the same reasons. In Appeal No. E/334/2008, the Tribunal partially upheld it for the normal period of limitation, sending the matter back for re-quantification, and setting aside the imposed penalty due to the absence of suppression, misstatement, or mala fide intent by the appellant. en-us Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253772 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in Appeal No. E/3648/2006, allowing the appeal based on limitation and jurisdiction grounds. Conversely, Appeal No. E/2758/2007 by the Revenue was rejected for the same reasons. In Appeal No. E/334/2008, the Tribunal partially upheld it for the normal period of limitation, sending the matter back for re-quantification, and setting aside the imposed penalty due to the absence of suppression, misstatement, or mala fide intent by the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253772