<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 904 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by deleting disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) for payments not qualifying as subcontractor payments and directing the deletion of the ESIC and PF addition if payments were timely. The addition of long-term capital gains and partial ad-hoc disallowances were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 904 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by deleting disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) for payments not qualifying as subcontractor payments and directing the deletion of the ESIC and PF addition if payments were timely. The addition of long-term capital gains and partial ad-hoc disallowances were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>