<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 390 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167006</link>
    <description>Intermediate goods captively consumed in manufacture remain dutiable where they fall within a specific excise tariff entry, even if treated, resin-impregnated or of limited shelf-life. Treated paper and treated cotton fabrics were held to be correctly classifiable under the relevant specific entries, not the residuary item, because their processed character brought them within the tariff descriptions. Treated glass fabrics impregnated with resin were not finally sustained under Item 22B on the record available and were remitted for fresh classification against the proper competing entries. Non-disclosure of captive consumption in returns under the self-removal regime justified invocation of the extended period from the date the approved classification list took effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 390 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167006</link>
      <description>Intermediate goods captively consumed in manufacture remain dutiable where they fall within a specific excise tariff entry, even if treated, resin-impregnated or of limited shelf-life. Treated paper and treated cotton fabrics were held to be correctly classifiable under the relevant specific entries, not the residuary item, because their processed character brought them within the tariff descriptions. Treated glass fabrics impregnated with resin were not finally sustained under Item 22B on the record available and were remitted for fresh classification against the proper competing entries. Non-disclosure of captive consumption in returns under the self-removal regime justified invocation of the extended period from the date the approved classification list took effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>