<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 542 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166998</link>
    <description>Whether interest on FDRs constitutes &quot;business income&quot; for deduction under s. 80HHC, the HC held it does not, as such interest is not derived from export business and, post insertion of Explanation (baa) w.e.f. 1-4-1992, must be excluded while computing eligible profits; consequently, deduction could not be allowed by treating it as business income. The assessee&#039;s plea of consistency based on prior years&#039; treatment was rejected because an erroneous past approach cannot override the statutory scheme after Explanation (baa), and the AO was justified in taking a different view for AYs 1997-98 and 1998-99; accordingly, the Tribunal&#039;s orders were set aside, the Department&#039;s appeals were allowed, and s. 80HHC relief was directed to be recomputed without such interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 542 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166998</link>
      <description>Whether interest on FDRs constitutes &quot;business income&quot; for deduction under s. 80HHC, the HC held it does not, as such interest is not derived from export business and, post insertion of Explanation (baa) w.e.f. 1-4-1992, must be excluded while computing eligible profits; consequently, deduction could not be allowed by treating it as business income. The assessee&#039;s plea of consistency based on prior years&#039; treatment was rejected because an erroneous past approach cannot override the statutory scheme after Explanation (baa), and the AO was justified in taking a different view for AYs 1997-98 and 1998-99; accordingly, the Tribunal&#039;s orders were set aside, the Department&#039;s appeals were allowed, and s. 80HHC relief was directed to be recomputed without such interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>