<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 99 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253755</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by Aramex India Private Limited, deleting the transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 8,91,71,424. It directed the correct levy of interest under sections 234B, 234C, and 234D, highlighting a computational error in the interest calculation under section 234D. The initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was considered premature and academic in light of the Tribunal&#039;s findings on the transfer pricing adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 99 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253755</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by Aramex India Private Limited, deleting the transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 8,91,71,424. It directed the correct levy of interest under sections 234B, 234C, and 234D, highlighting a computational error in the interest calculation under section 234D. The initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was considered premature and academic in light of the Tribunal&#039;s findings on the transfer pricing adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>