<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 95 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the notice under Section 148 and subsequent proceedings. It found the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to apply his mind, dispose of objections, and made additions not linked to reasons for reopening assessment. The AO&#039;s actions were deemed invalid and unsustainable, resulting in dismissal of other grounds raised by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 95 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the notice under Section 148 and subsequent proceedings. It found the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to apply his mind, dispose of objections, and made additions not linked to reasons for reopening assessment. The AO&#039;s actions were deemed invalid and unsustainable, resulting in dismissal of other grounds raised by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>