<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 93 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the transaction was a slump sale, and the provisions of section 50B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were applicable. The sale consideration was Rs. 78.45 lacs, and no capital gain arose as the net worth was deemed the cost of acquisition. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to verify compliance with section 50B(3). The appeal by the Revenue was disposed of on these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:16:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 93 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the transaction was a slump sale, and the provisions of section 50B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were applicable. The sale consideration was Rs. 78.45 lacs, and no capital gain arose as the net worth was deemed the cost of acquisition. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to verify compliance with section 50B(3). The appeal by the Revenue was disposed of on these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>