<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 88 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253744</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the income from the land sale was assessable in the hands of VEPL, not the assessee. The decision was based on the ownership evidence, treatment of the transaction as business income, and applicability of Section 50C. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s well-supported conclusion, in line with the precedent set in a co-owner&#039;s case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 88 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253744</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the income from the land sale was assessable in the hands of VEPL, not the assessee. The decision was based on the ownership evidence, treatment of the transaction as business income, and applicability of Section 50C. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s well-supported conclusion, in line with the precedent set in a co-owner&#039;s case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>