<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 81 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253737</link>
    <description>The court declined to interfere with the impugned summons issued by respondent No. 1 authority in Kochi, Kerala, despite the appellant&#039;s challenge to territorial jurisdiction. The court emphasized the principle of forum conveniens, stating that the mere receipt of the summons in Kolkata did not establish cause of action within that territory. The court clarified that its decision did not address the case&#039;s merits and granted the appellant liberty to challenge the summons before the appropriate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 22:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 81 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253737</link>
      <description>The court declined to interfere with the impugned summons issued by respondent No. 1 authority in Kochi, Kerala, despite the appellant&#039;s challenge to territorial jurisdiction. The court emphasized the principle of forum conveniens, stating that the mere receipt of the summons in Kolkata did not establish cause of action within that territory. The court clarified that its decision did not address the case&#039;s merits and granted the appellant liberty to challenge the summons before the appropriate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>