<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 51 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the notice issued under sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding that the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment were vague and lacked tangible material. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not apply independent mind and failed to establish a nexus between the information received and the inference drawn. As a result, the reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 08:39:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 51 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the notice issued under sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding that the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment were vague and lacked tangible material. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not apply independent mind and failed to establish a nexus between the information received and the inference drawn. As a result, the reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>