<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 48 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It ruled that the classification of income from share transactions as capital gains instead of business income was subjective and debatable, not warranting a penalty. The Tribunal emphasized that differences in legal interpretation do not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 08:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 48 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It ruled that the classification of income from share transactions as capital gains instead of business income was subjective and debatable, not warranting a penalty. The Tribunal emphasized that differences in legal interpretation do not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>