<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 43 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253699</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on all issues. The services provided were not classified as Management Consultancy Services, payments for export of services were exempt from service tax, and the show cause notice was deemed time-barred. The appeals were allowed, and the orders were pronounced on 13/11/2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 43 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253699</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on all issues. The services provided were not classified as Management Consultancy Services, payments for export of services were exempt from service tax, and the show cause notice was deemed time-barred. The appeals were allowed, and the orders were pronounced on 13/11/2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>