<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 38 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253694</link>
    <description>A summons issued under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for inquiry into alleged service tax non-payment or evasion does not, by itself, establish that adjudicatory or recovery proceedings have been initiated against the person summoned. The provision permits summons to any person, including a prospective assessee or third party, for examination and production of documents. On that basis, mere issuance of summons was treated as insufficient to presume coercive tax proceedings, and interim protection from coercive steps was preserved for a limited period while the petitioner was directed to appear before the authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 38 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253694</link>
      <description>A summons issued under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for inquiry into alleged service tax non-payment or evasion does not, by itself, establish that adjudicatory or recovery proceedings have been initiated against the person summoned. The provision permits summons to any person, including a prospective assessee or third party, for examination and production of documents. On that basis, mere issuance of summons was treated as insufficient to presume coercive tax proceedings, and interim protection from coercive steps was preserved for a limited period while the petitioner was directed to appear before the authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>