<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 8 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253664</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the ex-employees of Kirloskar Copeland Ltd., allowing them exemption under Section 10(10C) of the Income-tax Act for compensation received under the VRS-2000. The Tribunal found that the VRS complied with Rule 2BA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, fulfilling all conditions, and directed the Assessing Officer to grant the exemption. The Tribunal emphasized the need to assess each scheme independently for compliance with specified conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 06:33:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 8 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253664</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the ex-employees of Kirloskar Copeland Ltd., allowing them exemption under Section 10(10C) of the Income-tax Act for compensation received under the VRS-2000. The Tribunal found that the VRS complied with Rule 2BA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, fulfilling all conditions, and directed the Assessing Officer to grant the exemption. The Tribunal emphasized the need to assess each scheme independently for compliance with specified conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>