<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 6 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act on the assessee for accepting cash deposits in violation of Section 269SS. The Tribunal found no reasonable cause for accepting cash deposits, disregarded the principle of mutuality, and emphasized that Section 269SS regulates the mode of accepting loans and deposits regardless of transaction genuineness. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty imposed by lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 08:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 6 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act on the assessee for accepting cash deposits in violation of Section 269SS. The Tribunal found no reasonable cause for accepting cash deposits, disregarded the principle of mutuality, and emphasized that Section 269SS regulates the mode of accepting loans and deposits regardless of transaction genuineness. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty imposed by lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>