<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 3 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessments under Section 147 for the relevant years was invalid as there was no failure to disclose material facts and the reasons for reopening were based on the same facts as the original assessments, amounting to a mere change of opinion. Consequently, the assessment orders were quashed for all relevant years, including those related to the disallowance of interest on the suspense account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 06:33:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 3 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessments under Section 147 for the relevant years was invalid as there was no failure to disclose material facts and the reasons for reopening were based on the same facts as the original assessments, amounting to a mere change of opinion. Consequently, the assessment orders were quashed for all relevant years, including those related to the disallowance of interest on the suspense account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>