<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 581 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166374</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision in a case concerning alleged undervaluation of goods cleared to trading firms in February and March 1997. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected as the findings showed goods were cleared at comparable prices to both trading units and other customers, negating under-valuation claims. The court deemed the decision legally sound, affirming no under-valuation by the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 09:19:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 581 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166374</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision in a case concerning alleged undervaluation of goods cleared to trading firms in February and March 1997. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected as the findings showed goods were cleared at comparable prices to both trading units and other customers, negating under-valuation claims. The court deemed the decision legally sound, affirming no under-valuation by the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>