<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 954 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166351</link>
    <description>The Tax Appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the assessee to reduce the penalty under Section 11AC of the Act to one-fourth if paid within 30 days. The Court clarified the applicability of the proviso to Section 11AC in 2010, emphasizing the importance of timelines and statutory compliance. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s duty to explain the provisions of Section 11AC and the need for compliance with all provisos were also considered. The Court&#039;s decision aligned with past interpretations, emphasizing consistency in penalty provisions and upholding the Tribunal&#039;s order, providing clarity on penalty reduction in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:12:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 954 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166351</link>
      <description>The Tax Appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the assessee to reduce the penalty under Section 11AC of the Act to one-fourth if paid within 30 days. The Court clarified the applicability of the proviso to Section 11AC in 2010, emphasizing the importance of timelines and statutory compliance. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s duty to explain the provisions of Section 11AC and the need for compliance with all provisos were also considered. The Court&#039;s decision aligned with past interpretations, emphasizing consistency in penalty provisions and upholding the Tribunal&#039;s order, providing clarity on penalty reduction in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>