<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 902 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166339</link>
    <description>Payment of differential duty before issuance of a show cause notice does not, by itself, extinguish liability to interest and penalty under the Central Excise Act. Interest under Section 11AB follows delayed payment of duty, while penalty under Section 11AC may apply where short-levy or short-payment is linked to fraud, suppression, wilful misstatement, or intent to evade duty. The Tribunal&#039;s view that pre-notice payment automatically ended penalty proceedings was inconsistent with the settled principle. The Revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded on this point, though the matter was remitted for consideration of the separate plea regarding reversal of credit before utilisation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 902 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166339</link>
      <description>Payment of differential duty before issuance of a show cause notice does not, by itself, extinguish liability to interest and penalty under the Central Excise Act. Interest under Section 11AB follows delayed payment of duty, while penalty under Section 11AC may apply where short-levy or short-payment is linked to fraud, suppression, wilful misstatement, or intent to evade duty. The Tribunal&#039;s view that pre-notice payment automatically ended penalty proceedings was inconsistent with the settled principle. The Revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded on this point, though the matter was remitted for consideration of the separate plea regarding reversal of credit before utilisation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>