https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166337 The court ruled in favor of the respondent, finding that the duty paid on fuel used for generating electricity within the factory for non-excisable activities satisfied Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's argument regarding the reversal of credit for exempted goods was dismissed due to lack of evidence and failure to challenge the quantification of the amount. The court also upheld the respondent's reliance on the precedent regarding admissibility of credit for inputs used for electricity generation within the factory premises, ultimately deciding in favor of the respondent based on the evidence and legal arguments presented. en-us Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:07:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166337 The court ruled in favor of the respondent, finding that the duty paid on fuel used for generating electricity within the factory for non-excisable activities satisfied Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's argument regarding the reversal of credit for exempted goods was dismissed due to lack of evidence and failure to challenge the quantification of the amount. The court also upheld the respondent's reliance on the precedent regarding admissibility of credit for inputs used for electricity generation within the factory premises, ultimately deciding in favor of the respondent based on the evidence and legal arguments presented. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166337