https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166336 The Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing the Petitioner-Company to pre-deposit 25% of the duty confirmed, criticizing the lack of consideration for the company's financial records and closure of the factory. The Court found the Tribunal's decision unclear and contradictory, emphasizing the importance of allowing the Petitioner-Company to present relevant documents. The impugned order was quashed, and the Tribunal was instructed to reconsider the stay prayer after the Petitioner-Company submits necessary documents within four weeks. The Court disposed of the writ petition, emphasizing procedural fairness and the importance of considering all evidence before making decisions. en-us Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:07:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166336 The Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing the Petitioner-Company to pre-deposit 25% of the duty confirmed, criticizing the lack of consideration for the company's financial records and closure of the factory. The Court found the Tribunal's decision unclear and contradictory, emphasizing the importance of allowing the Petitioner-Company to present relevant documents. The impugned order was quashed, and the Tribunal was instructed to reconsider the stay prayer after the Petitioner-Company submits necessary documents within four weeks. The Court disposed of the writ petition, emphasizing procedural fairness and the importance of considering all evidence before making decisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166336