<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 552 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166326</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit remained admissible where the supplier had paid duty on the input goods under a bona fide classification, because the recipient&#039;s adjudicating authority could not reopen or reassess the supplier&#039;s classification to deny credit. The duty shown on the supplier&#039;s documents constituted duty paid for purposes of the credit rule, and the assessee was entitled to rely on those documents. The challenge to the credit therefore failed, and the credit availed by the assessee was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 552 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166326</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit remained admissible where the supplier had paid duty on the input goods under a bona fide classification, because the recipient&#039;s adjudicating authority could not reopen or reassess the supplier&#039;s classification to deny credit. The duty shown on the supplier&#039;s documents constituted duty paid for purposes of the credit rule, and the assessee was entitled to rely on those documents. The challenge to the credit therefore failed, and the credit availed by the assessee was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>