<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 864 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166316</link>
    <description>Input tax credit under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act was held unavailable for fertilizers, pesticides, chemicals and agricultural machinery used in cultivating tea and coffee plantations. The court reasoned that the relevant business was manufacture and processing of tea and coffee for sale, while plantation cultivation was a separate activity and lacked the necessary nexus with the taxable business. Construing &quot;business&quot; as trade, commerce, manufacture and activities incidental or ancillary thereto, the court declined to extend &quot;input&quot; or &quot;any other use in business&quot; to cultivation inputs. The claimed credit therefore failed because goods used in plantation activity were not treated as inputs purchased in the course of business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 864 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166316</link>
      <description>Input tax credit under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act was held unavailable for fertilizers, pesticides, chemicals and agricultural machinery used in cultivating tea and coffee plantations. The court reasoned that the relevant business was manufacture and processing of tea and coffee for sale, while plantation cultivation was a separate activity and lacked the necessary nexus with the taxable business. Construing &quot;business&quot; as trade, commerce, manufacture and activities incidental or ancillary thereto, the court declined to extend &quot;input&quot; or &quot;any other use in business&quot; to cultivation inputs. The claimed credit therefore failed because goods used in plantation activity were not treated as inputs purchased in the course of business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>