<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 547 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166304</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the tax case revision, affirming the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to modify the appeal without providing specific findings. The Tribunal&#039;s actions in sustaining additions and setting aside penalties due to stock variations were upheld. The Court rejected the argument that penalty imposition should follow stock variation admission, emphasizing that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was appropriate as it was based on best judgment assessment rather than concrete estimates. Consequently, the Court found no substantial question of law to consider, leading to the dismissal of the case without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 547 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166304</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the tax case revision, affirming the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to modify the appeal without providing specific findings. The Tribunal&#039;s actions in sustaining additions and setting aside penalties due to stock variations were upheld. The Court rejected the argument that penalty imposition should follow stock variation admission, emphasizing that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was appropriate as it was based on best judgment assessment rather than concrete estimates. Consequently, the Court found no substantial question of law to consider, leading to the dismissal of the case without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>