<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 576 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166301</link>
    <description>AC generator sets fell within the specific notification entry for &quot;all kinds of generating sets&quot; and were taxable at four per cent. The wider expression was held sufficient to cover AC generator sets, so the residuary entry could not be used to impose the higher ten per cent rate. The Revenue&#039;s tax revision failed, and the assessment rate adopted by the Tax Board was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 576 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166301</link>
      <description>AC generator sets fell within the specific notification entry for &quot;all kinds of generating sets&quot; and were taxable at four per cent. The wider expression was held sufficient to cover AC generator sets, so the residuary entry could not be used to impose the higher ten per cent rate. The Revenue&#039;s tax revision failed, and the assessment rate adopted by the Tax Board was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>