<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1087 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166294</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an assessment order on job-work transactions due to non-issuance of form F. The court found no disobedience of its directions by the assessing authority, rejecting transactions without proper documentation. It held that there was no contempt of court as the authority acted in accordance with directions. The court also ruled out jurisdictional error and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal. The dismissal was based on the availability of an alternative remedy, with the option to seek condonation of delay in filing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1087 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166294</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an assessment order on job-work transactions due to non-issuance of form F. The court found no disobedience of its directions by the assessing authority, rejecting transactions without proper documentation. It held that there was no contempt of court as the authority acted in accordance with directions. The court also ruled out jurisdictional error and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal. The dismissal was based on the availability of an alternative remedy, with the option to seek condonation of delay in filing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>