<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1204 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166992</link>
    <description>The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Central Excise Appeal No. 46 of 2009 filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jalandhar against CESTAT Final Order No. 131/2008-EX(PB). The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty order, finding no intention to evade duty by the government undertaking Markfed. The appeal was dismissed as no question of law warranting its admission arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1204 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166992</link>
      <description>The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Central Excise Appeal No. 46 of 2009 filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jalandhar against CESTAT Final Order No. 131/2008-EX(PB). The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty order, finding no intention to evade duty by the government undertaking Markfed. The appeal was dismissed as no question of law warranting its admission arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>